| if you are seriously suggesting that, allow me to critique. it requires skill in architecture which most unemployed do not have, it is dangerous work, it uses valuable raw materials and destroys them, and produces absolutely nothing in the end.
the 'unemployment center' is a better choice because it will produce electricity to a certain capacity, and anyone can do it, unless they are on disability in which case they need no such help.
both concepts would provide some kind of paid-activity for the unemployed to perform, both could potentially seperate the lazy from the downtrodden if the employment policies were incorporated.
the point is that you're trying, even if there are problems. both in your post and in the work world this should be respected in some way. |