Quote:
Quote by: gallo  What idiot made any such claim? Did you actually read any of the discussion? Are you sure you know what is being discussed? It seems not.
That doesn't even make sense. Who has ever claimed that a mutation in elephants would cause changes in whales? Of course a mutation is in "the same species." A mutation in a population would cause a changed in the allele frequency in that population, and that would be evolution. It would have no effect on other species. Try to think about what you are saying before you say it.
No, he isn't. You don't seem to know what you are talking about.
Only if you get your biology from religious tracts. Wouldn't it be nice if you actually read biology to learn about biology?
It is quite evident that you have studied up on religious objections to science rather than studying science. As a result, you don't know much about science, biology in particular.
Is that why you post one line religiously motivated objections instead of meaningful discussion? If you actually follow your rule, you won't be posting in this topic any more? |
since when was micro the same as macroevolution? where do you get that idea? microevolution-also known as 'natural selection'
also, i've seen the two confused almost everytime i see evolution explained. people think that an animal keeps mutating until it becomes a whole new species.
why can't i come from the other side? why can't i oppose evolution, in my own style? isn't that what debate is about? and, just to let you know, i read the most lefty biology book EVER so don't tell me i don't know what i'm talking about.