| Oh OK, sorry Geoff, missed that (I have to get used to the lay-out, I'm not finding it easy with little time to navigate the pages efficiently).
Anyway, the post still stands as an attempt to put Dawkins in your category 3 with a notion of free will not determined by any extra-material matters.
By the way - I find both Dennett & Searle to be, respectively, too pompous & too abstract for comfort. In the area of philosophy of mind, I would prefer a Dawkins angle combined with a Jaynesian geneology.
Plse don't leave me.
GuidoNius |