| And thus by stating your stance my point was made. You are not being fair in your division of probabilities, nor your exclusive criticism of the big bang when you think that creationism is dominant and ignore that it has the same logical issue.
Tell me, why are you not neutral on this issue, considering the limited data concerning the nature of "things" before the universe, and our ignorance concerning the laws that might have preceded this unknown condition, or indeed, our ignorance of whether there are laws without the universe at all? |