Quote:
Isbskins said:
So you are free to load someone's plain statements up with your interpretations but if I read anything into what you "mean" by burden, I am not playing fair?
|
I say:
No, that isn't what I said. I said if you wanted to be CORRECT about how I feel, I should explain it, instead of you, since you have no clue how I feel.
I said what I did, for you to use against me, since you seem to think you have the logical ground with which to do it. I provided the ammunition. Fire away.
Quote:
Isbskins said:
Being an existentialist, I expect that my fellow humans will behave in such a way and it doesn't make me want to resort to armed revolt.
|
I say:
Expect in one hand, shit in the other, tell me which fills up first.
I don't WANT to revolt, I claim we NEED to revolt, see the difference?
Quote:
Isbskins said:
But you, requiring that I have faith in my fellow humans, essentially put everyone in a no-win situation, because even you, who is cut of such obviously moral cloth, can not manage to hold to a consistent set of rules and nothing of any "life or death" value is at stake.
|
I say:
In case you didn't notice, I am one of the few fighting for our ORIGINAL RULES< the ones before the perversion, you know, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, for all men.
Isn't silly to say I am willing to stick to no standard, when I am saying the only standard we ever TRULY HAD, was our Constitution which was drafted hundreds of years ago?
Am I not the one clinging to a standard, while all those about me seek to perverse that standard to THEIR OWN ENDS, be it party, corporation or corrupted individual?
Are you going to directly answer ANY of my questions, or only speak indirectly, since you have no argument, I assume?