Quote:
|
Quote by: Zeebadee Quote: |
Quote by: dsanthony
Now, they are seeking to use "extra" constitutional means to destroy the results of the election. If Bush is president, they do not feel it necessary to remain loyal to the country of their birth. If it means criticizing the war effort, or even violating laws by releasing top secret information--they are determined to nullify the election.
| You haven't answered me - exactly how will the release of information by the NY Times nullify the election? |
The Dems were against Bush's policies and agenda. They ran Kerry against him. They lost. Now they are using illegal means in an attempt to destroy the ability of Bush to implement the policies and agenda that the people elected him to pursue.
What's worse, they are giving our enemies direct information about the strategies and tactics of the US war.
The only close analogy would be if the Repubs, who opposed FDR, had leaked information about breaking the Japanese code in WW2, or leaked info about Operation Overlord before the invasion of Normandy.
Treason is treason.