| I'd like to hear from any war supporter how leaving this insurgency to the Iraqis at our earliest opportunity can be remotely considered a "win" of any kind. Bush keeps saying our goal is to let the Iraqis handle their own affairs, and that means to me there will be no "victory", only a transfer of responsibility for those who are fighting this civil war.
We WILL retreat. It's not a matter if IF but a matter of when. I believe to actually stop the violence we will have to kill half the country. But if we did that, why did we have a problem with Saddam?
Of course, I am for letting them fight their own battles, but in no way can I consider it a "victory", a win or anything else.
Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots. |