No, I wasn't; it would be nice for you if I were, because then you can call names instead of addressing the issue.
However, the point there was that EVERYONE uses their morality to dictate their political stances on what actions are or are not illegal.
I demonstrated that even those who wish "sexual equality" for homosexuals use their own morality to support the outlawing of pedophilia and other sexual preferences.
Mia, yes, I am a sinner saved by Grace. That doesn't mean I want my own sins legalized though.
And for the record, if there were an "Adulterer's Group" I would be saying the same exact thing.
The KKK has no Biblical support for killing black people.
Quote:
Do you really not get the difference between consensual acts in which no laws are broken or harm inflicted and acts in which both of those do take place?
|
Consent is a moral qualifier that you have introduced into the equation, which leads me to ask how you can justify using your own morality as a basis for outlawing a sexual preference?
Quote:
| Just because NAMBLA says it's a way of life as legitimate as homosexuality doesn't make them comparable |
You are using your morals to come to that conclusion.
NAMBLA supposedly doesn't support rape, but "sexual education and liberation" for all ages.
Don't get me wrong; I view NAMBLA as a dangerous organization, but you have yet to show me, without YOUR moral qualifiers of consent and age why their sexual preference shouldn't be equal.
Since I admittedly use my morality, I have no problem in supporting the outlawing of pedophilia.