| This thread is a fairly good example of why academics shouldnt be law makers, ever. The number of people defending paedophilia based on legal arguements or academic arguements is sickening. A 14 year old is a child, and sex with a child is moral issue. Ask any parent if they would want their 14 year old engaging in sexual activity and the answer will be no. Any parent that woiuld consent to their child having sex has moral issues that seriously need addressing. Any person that would argue in favour of a child having sex because of preconcieved ideas on maturity or anything else also has serious moral issues that need addressing.
The other part of this thread I agree with. Homosexuality is a sexual perversion. Paedophilia is a sexual perversion. By extending rights to one group, you open the door to an extrension of rights to another group. We reap what we sew. Parents are loosing the battle for their children as states and governments take those rights away and replace them with their own lowered morality or political correct political agenda. We now have the ridiculous situation where schools can and do teach things to our children that parents either do not know about or do not agree with.
My daughter can be given birth control at school without my knowledge. She can also arrange an abortion, can arrange alternative accommodation, can explore sexual perversion in class etc, all without my knowledge or consent as a parent
Is the state more qualified to raise kids than parents? Does that state have more rights over a child than the childs parents?
You have two choices in life:
You can stay single and be miserable,
Or get married and wish you were dead. |