View Single Post
Old Apr 18, 2004, 10:18 pm   #18 (permalink) (top)
ConservativeX
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally posted by Giancarlo,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Giancarlo,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-ConservativeX,

Giancarlo, is there ANY sexual preference that you find morally wrong?

ANY?
*yawn* Anything else you want to ask homophobe?

I think heterosexuality or homosexuality are not wrong. And it is not a preference, it is an orientation. [/b][/quote]

Leave the name calling to the Left, G. I've read a lot of your posts; you're better than that.

And you didn't answer my question; is there any kind of sexual preference/orientation that you find morally wrong?

If so, do you support ANY of them being outlawed?

Quote:
No, none of it is acceptable. You can't harass people and call them "faggots" and shit for their sexual orientation. You just can't harass people, period.
Except "homophobes", eh?

That's a double standard, G.

The fact is that name calling, while not desirable in a debate, is protected speech (if not libelous or slanderous in nature).

Quote:
Damn you, conservativex, you shouldn't be in this thread.
Why? Because you can't address my points in the other similar thread?

http://www.volconvo.com/forums/index.php?s...opic=1068&st=30


The foundation of the Constitution is laid on the 10th Amendment. To take a single step beyond is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition - JEFFERSON
ConservativeX is offline   Reply With Quote