| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (PatrickHenry,) </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Impenitent,) wmd's were in iraq? wait.... that means bush was RIGHT... no no no, can't have that...<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>I didn't see WMD in the news story (which see). But why will the Occupation "Authority" not respond? Why, if hazardous radiological materials are, or were formerly, located in Iraq, why are they not secured?
:rolleyes: because the idiots on the left were SCREAMING "LOOK NO WMDS!!! NO WMDS!!! BUSH WAS A CRIMINAL!!! NO WMDS"
:rolleyes: and what does that get you? dirty bombs made from iraqi radiological materials... what do you think a WMD IS?!?
I think if the spinners could make this into a "Bush Was Right!" story they would have done so.
:rolleyes: don't worry, they will... and guess what? the OTHER WMDS will surface right before the election... conspiracy conspiracy!! bush will laugh his way through a second term with a republican house and senate as well... and guess who gets to fix the courts then... <hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
"I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long..."
insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results... |