.
Quote:
|
Quote by: PatrickHenry I'm not actually making the allegation at this point, Sonart. The people I quoted are noting the Iraqi allegations, and I am gazing at the phenomenon with binoculars. Since our worldviews differ, I don't expect a lot of agreement from you on this, but thanks for taking the time to look at it. |
I was addressing Milton's comments, Patrick, not yours. As I stated, I have no definitive view on British operations in Iraq and I've taken your links for what they are, without the benefit of having seen any other points of view.
However, as with 'conspiracy' topics, I think it's important to base any debate on a fair groundwork. Milton's assumption that because there's video of bombings it is somehow added proof of British complicity is a false premise. We KNOW that the insurgents and terrorists have been consistantly recording their attacks, and that these videos are widely available. Therefore the fact that attacks have been "conveniently" recorded is not proof of anything other than insurgents and terrorists have been recording their attacks and are proud of it.
I'm not arguing with you, Patrick, I'm just trying to keep it real. Fair enough?
.