Mr Vic;
Gee I dont know, am I supposed to post a full article from a Blog, to dispute your Blog?
First of all, your post did lie. Note the facts I presented (in post #6):
May 27, 2003: Pentagon Memo To Admin.: Iraq Trailers Not WMDs...
May 29, 2003: Bush: “We Have Found Weapons Of Mass Destruction.”
The admin was informed of the flawed intel 2 days before he told the world they found WMDs, a lie.
He repeated that lie for months. Your Blog didnt address that. Except to lie:
Quote:
|
If you look at this timeline, one thing jumps out. Bush's May 29, 2003 statement, which certainly appears to be wrong based on what we know now, was not clearly a lie or a mistake at the time.
|
Sure it was, in fact just TWO Days Prior, the Pentagon had informed the WH that it was not a weapons lab. But that went against bushs agenda. That was un-doing the last leg of evidence bush had against Iraq. That was UN-FIXING the intelligence around the war policy. Better hide that.
Quote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...101888_pf.html
On May 29, 2003, 50 days after the fall of Baghdad, President Bush proclaimed a fresh victory for his administration in Iraq: Two small trailers captured by U.S. and Kurdish troops had turned out to be long-sought mobile "biological laboratories." He declared, "We have found the weapons of mass destruction."
|
Bush knew it was a LIE when he said it. Or are you arguing bush is out of the loop. That he only reads the teleprompter. That hes on a "Need to know basis". That he cant be trusted within 10 feet of anything even resembling intelligence. We all know its a foreign language to him.
Now perhaps WMDs arent so important to this WH.
Maybe the wrong answer would bring the wrath of junior on the bearer of bad news so nobody had the cajones to tell him. Is that what you are arguing?