The White House is still defending thier stand that they did not lie about Iraq having WMDs before the war, which data they used to justify the attacks.
Although the CIA had confirmed that the data used was not true, before the President made his statements, the White House said today that Bush spoke before he confirmed that the data was correct or not. (sort of like Dan Rather did).
They refused to answer directly if Bush knew that the data had been proven false before making his famous TV speech, but selected to go ahead and use the older speculations that had not been confirmed, or not. Dodging direct questions the spokesperson for the White House maintained that Bush was innocent of fowl play when giving his reasons about why we should go to war in Iraq.
That is the lastest news .... but hey? what's new about that claim?
Note: The above is my own words as I would report it. For the "official" news story click the link.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12286206/