| Lawyers, being REQUIRED, due to complexity of law, DUE TO STRAYING FROM RIGHTS which was brought on by the adoption of the BAR, and the concept that we outlaw all that is illegal, instead of just setting intelligent, reasonable limitiations on rights.
Lawyers are part of the problem. Even those with the truest citizen intents for well being, don't know THEY are part of the problem.
Court cases should be this simple....
"Did ------ violate your rights Mr. --------?"
"Yes indeed sir, he did by doing ------"
"Is that so defendant?"
"Yes(or no)"
"(If no) Do you have proof of the rights violations Mr. ------?"
"Yes I do."
The trial continues, the sides make their case to THE PEOPLE, and the people decide if rights were violated, whether or not BEYOND reasonable doubt, and then decide on punishment or innocence.
Nothing more than common sense.
Stare Decisis is just a tool for crutching up bad arguments for bad decisions.
As long as rights are untouchable by government, and enforced by the same, all will be well.
Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm
Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/
Osborn F. Enready |