Quote:
|
Quote by: rdnor Yes yes I know . Saddam was just an aging dictator and his sons were little boy scouts . For people that were never there you sure seem to be informed . Kind of like Micheal Moore is informed . So far , just hate Bush . If He had no weapons , why did he impede the UN inspectors and VIOLATE all those UN resolutions ? FYI , Bush does many things that I do not like and will not get into now . After 9/11 the gloves came off , like it or not . END . |
Maybe I'm missing the point...or maybe you are? When exactly was Saddam's hand in the cookie jar during 9/11? I'm not saying he was a great guy. Sure he was a militant and amoral bastard. But at the time, what did that have to do with the issue at hand? Nada. If anything we should have deployed intelligence there. How can you expect to win a war of this magnitude. Religion/Attrition makes for quite different circumstances than standard warfare. More blood has been shed in the name of God than any other cause, yet we went headlong into it and are surprised its not yet over.
You're right, the gloves are off, but the gloves are theirs not ours. Sure we have the means and the firepower, but what does that really get us when they actually look forward to death? It's almost impossible to gain the upper hand in that situation.
Meanwhile...where the fuck is Osama? Or did I miss that point as well?