Quote:
|
Quote by: lsbskins1 But the question people are trying to get you to answer is this:
How is it that the sexuality of this murderer should be seen as a reason to deny others of the same sexuality rights? A deviance based on something other than sexual orientation is the cause of the murder, not orientation. Not all Lesbians are compelled to kill children who do not call them "Daddy". Not a majority of them are, nor a significant minority. It is, simply, a statistical aberation. It would be the same as a step-father killing a child for not calling him Daddy. The sexual orientation is not the cause of the crime. It is mearly an incidental fact. Does that explain what people are tring to get you to understand? |
First of all, I don't know of any lesbian couples (and I do actually know some lesbian couples) who insist on one of them being addressed in the masculine. It seems that's something more along the lines of gender identity disorder (something at least somewhat separate from sexual orientation).
As I said, though, it really doesn't matter why the child was killed; it only matters that the child was killed.
However, it is NOT the same as a step-father killing a child for not calling HIM "daddy" because "daddy" is an appropriate title for the man married to the child's mother: it is not (and will never be) an appropriate title for the WOMAN shacking up with the child's mother. What makes it worse than a man killing his step-child for not calling him "daddy" is that the child's
mother committed this heinous act because she was trying to force her child to do something that is simply contrary to nature (referring to a woman as if she was a man).