View Single Post
Old Mar 29, 2006, 01:09 pm   #11 (permalink) (top)
Technosoul
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 8,922
Quote:
Quote by: Morgan_Freeman
Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul
The point is that slavery in in violation of international and local laws.
This fits your definition of "slavery"? In that case, I see nothing wrong with "slavery". You've just rendered the term meaningless.

You're starting to sound like grandpa.

Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul
Being such we might also notice that the military does not use normal courts of law but has established its own system and procedings where the military has complete control over what rights are permitted, or what violations should be investigated or avoided.
Your point?

Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul
Their are other types of contracts that cause great disadvantages for consumers that I could gripe about but that would alter the bearing of this topic form being about the military (and those who are sometimes enlisted into service by deceptive promises).
What "deception" are you referring to?
It seems you wish to offer little substance in your debate. "I sound like Grandpa" - what is your point? And how would that counter what I was saying? Are you suggesting that I should debate what Grandpa sounds like? That makes no sense to me.

I do not agree that I re-invented the meaning of the word slavery. The military is called 'the service" and that is because it is about servitude, aka - master and slave.

What do i mean by deceptive? Ask Webster.
Technosoul is online now   Reply With Quote