Quote:
|
Quote by: RickSp So now we know that the Bible school boy can only really manage badly composed insults. Pathetic. And your claims are as empty as your school boy name calling. You claim that action is required by the Constitution but won't say where, because, surprise, surprise, you made it all up, like so much of your babbling. I notice that you provide no references, no links, absolutely squat to your idiotic assertions. You justify a brutal war based on your illiterate ranting. Grow up. |
your logic leads that if they were all atheists, then this would be an atheistic jihad. that is something that you deny, but don't seem to recognize that this is a two way road. when an American citizen is killed, the killer(s) declare war on America. why do you think murderers are cut off from society into a jail? these killers were the government of Iraq. their victims: American citizens. when you kill an American citizen for no damn reason outside of pure racism, you declare war on America. that is the final line. if you would like to read, read this:
Quote:
|
These cases settled the issue whether a state of war could exist without formal declaration by Congress. When hostile action is taken against the Nation, or against its citizens or commerce, the appropriate response by order of the President may be resort to force. But the issue [that has been] so much a source of controversy in the era of the Cold War and so divisive politically in the context of United States involvement in the Vietnamese War has been whether the President is empowered to commit troops abroad to further national interests in the absence of a declaration of war or specific congressional authorization short of such a declaration.\1431\ The Supreme Court studiously refused to consider the issue in any of the forms in which it was presented,\1432\ and the lower courts generally refused, on ``political question'' grounds, to adjudicate the matter.\1433\ In the absence of judicial elucidation, the Congress and the President have been required to accommodate themselves in the controversy to accept from each other less than each has been willing to accept but more than either has been willing to grant.\1434\
|
source another source