Quote:
Originally posted by G. Adams@09-16-2003 01:31 PM
Most lads mature slower than lasses. I noticed this at GCSE (16 for none UK'rs), while all the lasses were hard revising and worrying, most of the lads couldn't care less. This was less the case at A-level (18), but still the lasses seemed under more pressure. I don't know if its different at Uni as I'm only about to start 2 weeks from now. |
I agree with this
I finished GCSE Last year and am starting As this year (woo)
Agree, it seems to be the girls under thge pressure, but is that a sign of inteligence or a sign of how suseptable yteenage girls are to the thoughts of others? I would imagine its a bit of both. What I found at school however was that the very top people were boys, then there was a large wad of girls and then the boys were at the bottom again. Boys eem to be extremist, being both the best and the worst.
From what Ive heared, through GCSE and A-level, Girls tend to outshine boys, but at university Boys often do better. who knows why.
Ultimatly (I know this sounds good having just contributed to the argument) I get quite fed up with this Girls vs boys argument. Does it really matter? Maybe girls are better? so sodding what, we are a bisexual species and our society would almost certainly collapse without one gender.
Actually it wouldnt bother me if women took over the world, they can rule, they can go out and fight, they can be the ones who always loose out in a split, they can be the ones who have be careful over every word they say incase it MIGHT be considered prejadice, they can be the ones who are expected to fend for themselves, they can be the ones who get called poofs for being emotional, they can be the poloticions responsible for misery. You go girls!