| As if some pictures of a lobbyist in the same room with our president are proof of something underhanded? Sounds more like leftwing idiocy to me. No one has to prove anything Gr8 except you who are making the insinuation!
What you post falls under the definition of argumentum ignoratum ..that is what you say is true because no one has proved it isn't. Common sense and history prove your not even close on that one. ! The history is comprised of your continually demonstrated bigotry which has warped your version of truth.
My version is that a President comes in contact with literally thousands of citizens in a week or so. What they are doing is unknown to him. A problem does arise when a President uses his power to pardon a wanted felon(for a donation to his library fund) as your leftwing hero Clinton is known to have done. That's serious and deserving of criticism.
It turns out that many of the politicians who were influenced with Indian money were from both parties. Thats they way the system legally functions, Lobbyist are charged with attempting to influence politicians. They operate in a legal sense within the system. Abramoff went beyond that by defrauding the Indian tribes who gave him the money. Thats not cause to indict any politician who took Indian money through him.
The politicians who gave back such moneys were vying for political favor with their constituents and IMNSHO didn't have to.
Thus we play the fools with the time, and the spirits of the wise sit in the clouds and mock us. |