| Bush Policy is evil, we know what the real issue is here. Bush approved a change, or his administration made a change, so since THEY did it, it's evil. It's obvious that is what really has some of you all up in arms.
You don't care about the what and the how, or even the hard science, just aht Bush made a change, and some people made a fuss about it. It's Bush, some people don't like it, it must be evil. Instead of making legitimate claims, a good link to both sides of the issue, the OP started out by trying to equate Bush to Saddam.
Hey Bush haters, don't you get it yet? Has it not SUNK in that no one, outside of your fringe, is buying the attempts to compare Bush to evil people? Did not the 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections make it clear, NO ONE IS BELIEVING your lines?
You have a problem with the changes being made... okay great. It's a free country, you are welcome to say what you want about that. But instead of making a real case, with real information on why it's so bad, and if you really want to convince people you show why the administration MADE the changes.. you have to make ABSURD comparisions to try and get your point across.
There in should be the big clue, if you have to go to such extremes to make a point, that maybe your position is very weak. Very weak indeed.
I use the chicken little as a counter to the absurdity of the claimaint. As long as the Anti-Bush crowd can offer nothing but outlandish claims, then no one is going to take them seriously. Not that I mind, but it's funny to watch, and even funnier to point this out and watch them keep making the same mistakes.. over and over and over again.
Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |