Quote:
|
Quote by: Apeman81 You DO know that the case you refer to had Alito as one of a panel of Jurists, and that therefore Judge Alito did NOT have sole control of the decision? |
True, it was a panel of 3 judges.
Quote:
|
You DO know that he stated he would be willing to recuse himself, then when asked, DID recuse himself?
|
Doesnt matter. He lied when he said he would voluntarily recuse himself and then tried to pull a fast one. He got caught! He is a FRAUD.
Quote:
|
You DO know that the case was then reheard and the next panel came to same conclusion as the panel of which Alito was a member?
|
Yes, and your point?
Is your point that they found another crooked judge to replace the first? Very impressive.
Quote:
|
Your having based your argument on partial and incorrect data suggests you may wish to rethink the issue
|
What partial and incorrect data?
This? ........
Quote:
|
Quote by: FORBES Link
In 2002, Alito served on a three-judge panel of the 3rd Circuit that ruled unanimously in favor of Vanguard in a case involving the account of a deceased investor. The investor's widow sought a new review and Alito's disqualification, citing his substantial investments in the company.
Alito wrote to the chief judge of the circuit that he did not believe he was required to withdraw from the case but would step aside voluntarily. The letter did not mention his promise to the Senate in 1990.
The court reheard the case and came to the same conclusion. |
Nothing I said is contrary to these facts