Quote:
|
Quote by: underbear1 Arnold you had a chance to improve California and you BLEW IT (so to speak.)
It wouldn't have been as expensive as harbors or roads, it was opening marriage for all Californians.
I think it also shows in your LACK of favorability ratings, LGBT and our friends are a force not to be dismissed in CA, and hiring one dyke assistant isn't going to win our admiration. |
And Arnold would say " ahhh, don't be a girlyman".
But you have a point and that is that we have a very large gay population here in Caifornia and, in fact, the gay culture has whole cities that they dominate by number count.
The gay culture, like the Mexican-American culture, cannot be snubbed by this states leadership, and that goes of Indians too.
Being that he worked in Hollywood movies for so long that he surely must have worked with many gays because they are very much in demand by Hollywood because of their creative skills. The problem arose due to a fact that a while back (not sure how long ago that was) the voters had already voted for a bill that would conflict with the gay-marrage proposals, which law is now on the books. So we cannot vote in a new law that is in conflict with one already on the books unless that law is somehow removed from the books, I am not sure how one goes about the "un-doing" process? But under current law he could not promptly sign a new "marrage rule" without being in conflict with an existing legal taboo.