Quote:
|
Quote by: Abdullah Yes it is succesful but what is the use of their unceasing mutations, if they do not produce evolutionary change?
"No matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of evolution."-Grasse |
I'm sorry, who are you quoting?
You claimed that E. coli hadn't changed since several hundred millions of years ago, do you have the data to prove this? Do you have DNA from that era to compare? How did E. coli adapt to its new challenges? How did it become so good at living in our gut when you claim that the organism is hundreds of millions of years old but we humans are barely several hundred thousands?
Evolutionary change is happening all the time, just because we don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Our lifetime is relatively short but even today we see evolution happening. The emergence of antibiotic resistance is one of them. It is very prominent and no laughing matter. You may deny it, but for the medical world it is a serious threat.
Quote:
|
Quote by: Abdullah FYI People can die because of this disease, evolutionist would say anything to prove there point even if its illogical.
Some info on the SSA disease- info info more info |
Time to get out the beating stick. I know what SSA causes, notice that I was talking about the carriers, the hetereozygous. The homozygous of the mutant gene do indeed suffer greatly and will die but the carriers do have increased malaria resistance compared to normal Haemoglobin humans.
It's a statistical fact that the prevalence of SSC gene is greater in malaria inflicted areas than anywhere else. How do you go about explaining this?
By the way, do you know how many different mutations we've record thus far that causes SSA? I'll leave that be as your homework.
Quote:
|
Quote by: Abdullah o plz.... |
If you have nothing to contribute then don't post