Quote:
|
Quote by: |Chris| 1) it is a national treasure that regardless of whoever can or cannot afford to visit is besides the point |
That's one of the main points.
Why bother protecting nothing?
Oh hey look a stupid rock sitting in the middle of a wasteland with no animals or plant life in sight for a 100 miles. Oh hey lets protect it and call it a "national trasure".
Oh shoot, there's a ton of oil in that rock but we can't drill it out because it's a "national treasure".
Darn, I guess we'll have to keep buying oil from the arabs and support terrorism.
Quote:
|
2) you dont know no animals will be harmed. Opening up this would set a dangerous precedent. Whats next allowing development in Yellowstone, Glacier National Park?
|
You have to love how adorable dems are.
They have to compare Yellowstone and Glacier National to a wasteland with nothing in it to try and make an argument.