[Osborn F Enready]

Sean said:
That is the problem. You cannot debunk people who feel a) so strongly in favor of a conspiracy and b) rely on sources that can be convincing and so out there that we have nothing but what was reported to throw back at you. Debating with people who are reliant on conspiracies is pointless.

I say:
It is this mentality that leads to bad debate Sean.

No topic is not worthy of debate. I would think you would hold that as a hallmark.

People who don't know the facts, have trouble debating so called "conspiracy theorists" because people who usually wear this label have an immense amount of information covering a wide array of aspects concerning the issue. They are hard to debate, but NOT because they are misinformed, or overly skeptical, but because they have a LOT of information.

If you aren't up to the debate, don't add I always say.