| “There is no such thing as "definitive proof" of a scientific theory.”
Thank you for proving my point. Since you freely admit that the theories being taught in our schools, paid for by you and me, is not fact, but a reasoned BELIEF, then why is so wrong to entertain academically another BELIEF.
After all, we both pay for our children to attend the schools.
This argument is not about who is right or wrong, just the ability to represent dissimilar views. And please, don’t give me the drivel about keep religion out of science class. You know as well as I do that the teaching of theory as fact, that occurs every day in our schools, is no less an offense to education than a few words concerning the possibility that some intelligent designer (you said God, not I) may have had a hand in the beginnings of the universe, or, for that matter, the dawn of man.
Why is it that you fear even the mention of the possibility that life is not simply the result of random accidents? |