Thread: Worst invention
View Single Post
Old Mar 16, 2004, 06:07 pm   #26 (permalink) (top)
Automatic Nate
Molten Ash
 
Location: Bogart, GA, USA
Posts: 130
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (dave654,)
There's no such thing as a bad invention. The qualitative label "bad" is reserved for how the invention is used.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
Unless, that is, one cannot conceive of a "good" use for something. I'd argue that synthesized "plague" bacteria and such (I'm no expert on this, so be gentle if they don't actually exist and I'm just a Dubya dupe) are probably beyond the boundaries of what I could call "good use." Of course, I think that machine guns and nukyular weapons fall into that category as well.


&quot;For neither Man nor Angel can discern Hypocrisie,
The only evil that walks Invisible, except to God&quot;
--Paradise Lost
Automatic Nate is offline   Reply With Quote