Volconvo Debate Forums - View Single Post

Impenitent · Mar 7, 2004, 02:04 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Kyran,)

Imp, thanks for at least half-answering the question I put forth. Let's get moving right along.

****Ignoring the fact that your argument was refuted...

<blockquote>Quote:<hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Impenitent,)
no, it is not solved in civil court... and you still need police to enforce the laws of the civil court<hr size="1" /></blockquote>

Then you have distorted the meaning of "solved" in order to reflect your personal preference of justice.

:rolleyes: no, your idea of solved isn't justice or solved at all

An eye for an eye is equal; but an eye and 30 days for an eye is unjust. Your argument is inhumane, and promotes a lawless standard.

:rolleyes: you still need a police state to prosecute the civil cases

:rolleyes: inhumane? an eye for an eye is equal... an eye for $50 is NOT equal

When party A damages party B to the sum of $500, A should pay that amount in restitution. If I were the theatre owner, I would be satisfied with this amount of justice.

:rolleyes: and what if your spouse or children were trampled and killed in the theatre because skippy yelled "fire" as part of his free speech? mmm? what civil penalty for that? your idea of justice is not justice

However, you would not be satisfied; and you're not willing to give anyone else the choice over the matter. In your eyes, this action deserves jailtime.

:rolleyes: damn straight... but if you'd prefer to go back to the state of nature ala john locke... you'd be happy...

Prove me wrong. Describe the standards or principles on which you base your position. I've described how my Standard, concerning justice, applies to the above situation.

It will be very interesting to see you try to argue against Equal Retribution for Damages Rendered.

******you think you offer EQUAL RETRIBUTION? that is laughable...

<hr size="1" /></blockquote>

Mar 7, 2004, 02:04 am	#49 (permalink) (top)
Impenitent Hot Lava Posts: 1,859	</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Kyran,) Imp, thanks for at least half-answering the question I put forth. Let's get moving right along. **Ignoring the fact that your argument was refuted... </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Impenitent,)** no, it is not solved in civil court... and you still need police to enforce the laws of the civil court<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> Then you have distorted the meaning of "solved" in order to reflect your personal preference of justice. :rolleyes: no, your idea of solved isn't justice or solved at all An eye for an eye is equal; but an eye and 30 days for an eye is unjust. Your argument is inhumane, and promotes a lawless standard. :rolleyes: you still need a police state to prosecute the civil cases :rolleyes: inhumane? an eye for an eye is equal... an eye for $50 is NOT equal When party A damages party B to the sum of $500, A should pay that amount in restitution. If I were the theatre owner, I would be satisfied with this amount of justice. :rolleyes: and what if your spouse or children were trampled and killed in the theatre because skippy yelled "fire" as part of his free speech? mmm? what civil penalty for that? your idea of justice is not justice However, you would not be satisfied; and you're not willing to give anyone else the choice over the matter. In your eyes, this action deserves jailtime. :rolleyes: damn straight... but if you'd prefer to go back to the state of nature ala john locke... you'd be happy... Prove me wrong. Describe the standards or principles on which you base your position. I've described how my Standard, concerning justice, applies to the above situation. It will be very interesting to see you try to argue against Equal Retribution for Damages Rendered. ******you think you offer EQUAL RETRIBUTION? that is laughable... <hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> "I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long..." insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results...