[RickSp]

Warren is getting funny. He argues that ID is not creationism but refuses to define what he means by the term. He did fall back on "teleological evolution" but gave almost no hint of what he meant by that either. Now he claims that our biases prevent us from seeing ID, whatever he means by the phrase.

And when asked who the designer might be he goes off on a wierd riff involving Mount Rushmore. He claims there is "nothing to explain the origin of the sculptors!" a very curious statement as there is no end of evidence that would identify that Mount Rushmore was sculpted including much that identifies the sculptor my name. I guess this is evidence of ID that we are somehow not too biased to see.

Weird.