[belverron]

Quote by: Dirty Name Hmmm.... "the implications of accepting gay marriage are not appropriately used as an argument against it." Now that's the strangest logic I've ever heard. If "implications" are not to be considered, what then, do we consider? And let me also add that I find it absolutely amazing that you can argue for "equality" so earnestly, but when it comes to other forms of marriage, you refuse to consider it on equal terms with gay marriage.

I'm sorry. I failed to make myself clear. By implications I meant the issues not directly surrounding gay marriage, corollaries if you will. I am differentiating implications from direct consequences, or trying.