| Sonart- Absolutely mind boggling isn't it. I truly thought that Shrider was coming from the other side on this debate. First because he quoted instances of WMD in Iraq that turned out to be of no substance and clearly evidence that Saddam was indeed telling the truth. And then secondly because he quoted instances where many Americans on both political sides parroted the propaganda to justify war which claims were inevitably all proven to be wrong in the final analysis.
Can all of the war defenders be so stupid Sonart, as to believe that they are making a case in support of the war when in fact anyone who is in tune with reality would recognize their evidence (Shrider's in this instance) as being no more than strengthening the case for Saddam and against the justification for war? How disappointing that that seems to be an example of the best case being made prowar on this forum. It would be laughable if it wasn't so sad, that these people are so completely propagandized that they don't even know the difference! |