| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by
As far as I know, to declare something yours , you have to prevent others to "own it" , that despite the fact you work for it or not.
So isn't property coercicion ?<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
Only if one were to accept your strawman position rather than the facts of the matter. The ability or willingness to prevent others from committing theft, plays no role in property ownership.
Also, you make the error of assuming that even though your strawman statement does not include all instances of ownership (or better said claimed ownership) your assumption that all property is necessarily coercion does not even follow from the misrepresentation (strawman) that you created.
A thief does not own the property he has stolen, despite the fact that he may control it. |