Quote:
|
Quote by: Osborn F Enready WE NEVER HAD, NOR WILL NEVER HAVE A DEMOCRACY.
DO you understand what the difference is between a democracy and what WE have, a Constitutionally Limited, Democratic Republic? |
Democracy is not a form of government, but an ideology. The oposite of democracy is autocracy. We entered WWI crying "democracy and autocracy can not co exiest".
Unfortunately, that was in denial of the fact that our industry was modeled after England's autocracy, and we have never corrected this problem. The Deming Institute teaches the democratic model, but there still isn't wide spread understanding of why it is important.
Personally, I would like to see it made a city law that only industry using the democratic model, gets the scarce industry land.
I do not think you know what you are arguing against when you insist we are not a democracy and never were. Therefore, you don't know what you are arguing for. Please, consider, Germany was a Christian, Republic before it began Nazi and fascist. We have been on the same path since the 1958 National Defense Education, because only when democracy is defended in the classroom, is it defended, and we stopped doing that in 1958. We stopped transmitting our culture, and began praising efficiency, and left moral training to the church. Now we are like the Germany we defeated in world wars, than the US that played a major role in defeating Germany.
The New World Order Bush is proud to say we are, is the same New World Order Hitler promoted. It was orginally the concept of Dr. Fredrich Naumann.. "Dr. Fredrich Naumann has emphasized the fundamental differences between the war of yesterday and the war of to-morrow, and has pointed out what will be the chief difficulties the military command will have to contend with.
The war of the future is a problem of economic organization of the most difficult nature and the highest technological achievement, such as has never been hitherto demanded from any army. The old military qualities must give way to the organizing qualities. No doubt the courage and endurance of the individual soldier must remain for all times the foundation of military power, but organizing genius is required in order not to waste that courage and endurance. This is clearly shown from a mere examination of the colossal numbers engaged. To transport, to locate, and to feed these masses of men is the daily preoccupation of the military authorities. That they rightly understand the nature of the problem is certain, but it is very doubtful whether the problem can ever be adequately solved by commanders who are recruited from the Junkertum. Mere military capacity does not suffice here. Both enemies and friends admit that our corps of officers possess such military capacity. Anxiety only arises with regard to the other qualifications. We know that our industry possess in its industries successful organizers, brains accustomed to direct great quanties of material and "personnel"- men who create new conditions of life for whole economic districts without having to appeal to any authority. As democratic politicians we may often have to oppose bitterly those captains of industry, but if it comes to war we shall be willing to be led by them, because we know that they have the brains. It is true that they must not meddle with the technical duties of the officers, but the administration of the war material must be their province. And even with regard to the technique of war, it becomes from year to year more questionable whether this can be managed more efficiently by a corps of noblemen than by the representatives of middle class technique (industrial leaders). However much we may value the moral qualities of the ruling class-and, with all political difference of opinion, we shall not minimize those qualities- we must admit that we are witnessing a transformation of methods of attack and defence which in addition to the old question of iron discipline raises the modern question: how far shall we be able on the battlefield to replace the human unit through machinery? " 1915 "The Anglo-German Problem" by Charles Sarolea.
I hope you thought of Cheney and our economic structure and therefore the changed relationship between citizens and the federal government. People who insist we are not a democracy do not know the harm they are doing to everything we have valued. The New World Order has order, and unfortunately while the Bush dynasty and Cheney understand that, the general population does not.