View Single Post
Old Feb 28, 2004, 12:59 am   #38 (permalink) (top)
Impenitent
Hot Lava
 
Posts: 1,859
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (lcswoosh,)
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Impenitent,)
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (lcswoosh,)
No it won't. You can NOT put logic behind that statement. Because there isn't any. And it's only broadening the definition, it's not like it's stopping straights from marrying.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

logic? simple...

marriage is A

gay marriage is NOT A

A is NOT A?

changing the meaning of marriage destroys marriage
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>That's not logic. I didn't say try to justify your words with bigotry and ignorance.

marriage = the union of two people.

Does that mean marriage will be destroyed? No. Does that mean there won't be marriages between a man and a woman? No. Please, learn a decent argument.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

learn some very simple logic... the law of non-contradiction...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_non-contradiction

marriage=the union of a man and a woman

to change the participants in the definition, changes the definition


&quot;I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long...&quot;
insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results...
Impenitent is offline   Reply With Quote