Global Plot?
Quote:
|
Quote by: RickSp You seem to be implying that Newsweek is acting irresponsibly. On the contrary, they appear to be reporting the most current information available at the time of the publication. The information put out by the British government has been highly contradictory from day to day. Initially they suggested that the bombs were crude devices, then that they were of military quality, then that they used homemade explosives. I read a report similar to Newsweek's in the Times of London published a day before the Newsweek article. Terrorist gang 'used military explosives' |
I'll say it very explicitly.
1. Two stories that are not related have being joined together
intentionally.
2. One story is about bombs in London and is five paragraphs long.
Quote:
| The investigators are also exploring the idea that the explosives may have come from inside Britain or another foreign nation such as China the official said. |
CHINA is dropped into the story in a most extraordinary way from "a U.S. counter-terrorism official". You find nothing wrong? Is it not
malicious. Try it this way.
Quote:
| The investigators are also exploring the idea that the explosives may have come from inside Britain or another foreign nation such as US the official said. |
Still OK? Then at the end of seventeen more paragraphs we are told..
Quote:
| Police now believe the explosives used in the London bombings were acetone peroxide, a homemade concoction favored by suicide bombers in the Middle East. |
3. When someone writes
"...Plus, more on Gitmo interrogations " I certainly do not expect twelve more paragraphs. It is a very good
factual story about torture at Guantanamo Bay
hidden in a different story. Why? There is no Newsweek reporter who would bury such a juicy story.
This was done by an editor. Why?
Why was China not deleted before posting. It had to intentional.
.