[Osborn F Enready]

Dirty Name said:
And now for the links you apparently can't find on your own:

I say:
And isn't it funny how not ONE of those links suggests, or hints at homosexuals NOT being allowed to participate based on "society development".

Not one talks about the importance of keeping homosexuals out of the "society development" programs.

Not one that I looked at specified (Man Woman only) couples.


I give you credit though, at least you are trying to source your argument.....
Kudos.

I will give you the fact that government has tried to ease the burden of those who try to raise children (whether that is right or wrong/constitutional or unconstitutional or not) but because they ( the government) feels it is just, I want to know on what grounds they deem homosexuals UNFIT for being granted the SAME benefits. And when I see those grounds, I want to know how they were challenged, because if they weren't, THEY WILL BE.

You act as if you and Mr. Perfecto are representing the majority here, and I think as the retorts show, you aren't representing even a large MINORITY.