Quote:
|
Quote by: Dirty Name And yet, Prometheus finally decided to answer, while you are again on record refusing to answer a very basic question. |
Doing so didn't advance the debate. It simply gave you an opportunity to recite old material, yet again.
Quote:
|
Quote by: Dirty Name Please cite the passage in the Constitution where you derive this from. |
It's in the thread, stated several times by several people.
Quote:
|
Quote by: Dirty Name And don't forget that the very definition of marriage itself didn't require the explicit description of the genders involved in a marriage relationship. When this country was formed, "marriage = man + woman" just like "water = hydrogen2 + oxygen |
Wouldn't be because folks were jailed, pilloried, beaten, and hung by the Crown for engaging in
"the love that dare not speak its name" back then in England, would it?