Quote:
|
You would have a point if the government required proof of fertility in order to recognize a marriage. They do not. There are plenty of infertile couples and couples that have no desire to have children that have govenment recognition of their marriage.
|
I've addressed this already. The vast majority of couples are fertile. There is no need to weed out those who are not for several reasons:
1) The status of infertility is subject to change due to advances in medical science. Thus, many otherwise infertile couples still have the potential to become fertile.
2) It would require an invasion of privacy for the government to require fertility tests in the first place, and it would invade the privacy of a majority of people only to weed out a small handful of people - and for what purpose? To save the government a tiny fraction of a percent in federal tax revenue? It would cost more than it saved.
3) It is pointless to screen out those who wish to remain childless from marriage benefits. If "intent" were required before benefits were granted, any couple applying for benefits in the first place would necessarily be declaring their intent to have children, regardless of their true intentions.
4) Intent or ability to have children is subject to change, either due to attitude or medical advances. And the state has a compelling interest to ensure a strong marriage long before children enter the picture.