| Dirty Name, if you would then in your most basic logic, explain this and how it fits into the Law, under the Constitution.....
The Constitution states all people shall be treated equally in the eyes of the law.
(gays are people)
The Constitution states that all taxes should be levied equally.
(they aren't, favoring religous concepts of marriage, man/woman)
The term marriage comes from religion, and has been applied to law in the same meaning.
(Unconstitutional)
There is no pre-written stipulation in law that couples must be capable to reproduce, to recieve unconstitutional tax benefits based on marriage.
Your concept of society management glaringly fails to prove why gays shouldn't receive benefits based on anything other than they can't reproduce naturally. Even though they work, pay and purchase as any other consumer would. You also fail to show why society management can't compensate for this provision. You fail to show why there is any justification for the current unconstitutional tax breaks other than "it's been that way" or your opinion about it being "beneficial".
Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm
Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/
Osborn F. Enready |