Quote:
#1, i agree.
#2, having a gay couple or 2 in the community does not stop that.
#3, what does this have to with what’s under the debate?
|
#1: Good, I'm glad. It shows you're not an idiot.
#2: That was never my point.
#3: Everything. It's pretty basic stuff, dude.
Quote:
|
huh? is that your justification why a child-less gay couple (child-less hetero couple as well) should pay part of the cost for the education of their neighbor’s kids?
|
Yes, it is. You can either pay for them when they are young, or you'll be paying for them when they are old. If you want to have a debate about welfare and other entitlements, we can do that, but this isn't the place. Welfare is a reality. So are school and property taxes. Pick your poison. If you don't pay for school, then the burden rests entirely on the parents, resulting in poorer education, more people on welfare, fewer capable individuals, and as a result, a weaker society.
It's all about priorities, folks.