| I wish I could remeber exactly where I read it, or who said it...but the other day I came across a comment saying that this shouldn't be such a big issue, because she wasn't actually an "undercover agent" but was actually more just a supervisor. This totally ignores the fact that as an agency employee, her identity should have been shielded regardless of her role there. So the protective spin has already begun. I don't know that this "scandal" will actually touch the president, unless he's directly involved. But it won't make him look all that good considering his support of Rove over the years. |