| Scribler1, same thing, read my above post, you are way out of your league.
Unless you are a Geologist, or know a Geologist, I suggest you refrain from thinking that "Robots" can do all the work. Also, you are mistaken about the Hubble, NASA reluctantly was going to upgrade it "again".
They are more than happy to be letting that pile of junk fall back to Earth. After all, we now are constructing more powerful telescopes on the Earth using arrays. The Hubble is only an apature of 2 meters right? Something like that. It has a resolution if pointed at the Moon of 100 meters. Not that that matters bscause the brightness of the Moon and its closeness, is too much for the Hubble.
But there is an observatory being built right now (due to be finished in 2005) in Chile, that will have a resolution of less than a meter if pointed towards the Moon. Its high elevation and constant cold temperatures also mean that the atmosphere will be of relatively minimal interference.
The Hubble, is an out dated machine, better to just let it go now. |