Aug 29, 2003, 01:57 pm
|
#15 (permalink)
(top)
|
| Sedimentary Rock | Quote: Originally posted by GreatWyrm of Babylon@Aug 28 2003, 03:01 PM Okay, I will addres these on at a time, and see if the lot of you are willing to debate using reason rather than numerical advantage.
Myth
I stated destroying the oilfields because leaving them intact allows that cheap shot about claiming that America is in it for the oil. hat would have been the only way to quell that lame attack.
John
One soldier a day is fairly insignificant, we have greater causualties in Basic training than that. (lol)
Jay
Yes, it woul be nice if we could attack the source of the terrorist money, but we do recognize that that is not feasable. The rest of the world is more dependent on oil than we are. Think about it...
Dislogic
Bush is our President, not our king. A president is more of a slave to the responsibilities of power than a monarch, you may want to learn them...
Pooeypants
Who cares about WMD, do no recall any being used on the Twin Towers... | But America IS only in it for the oil. |
| |