Thread: archaeopteryx
View Single Post
Old Jun 11, 2005, 02:47 pm   #87 (permalink) (top)
gallo
Homo sapiens
 
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,234
Quote:
Quote by: jeafl
My posts simply reflect the information that can be found in some creation science literature.
I think that you should have said that your posts reflect the misinformation in "creation science" literature.
Quote:
Quote by: jeafl
Unless and until you are willing to give creation science a fair hearing, you are in no position to criticize what creation scientists believe.
That's not true. When one sees wild assertions without any evidence to support them, followed by a refusal of whoever posted the assertion to follow up with requested evidence, one can pretty much reject the assertion. The is especially true when the assertion is known to be incorrect because it happens to conflict with the field of ones study. Sinc so much of "creation science" (an oxymoron) is nonsense, it is pretty sure that one should first doubt anything said by a creationist until some sort of evidence, followed by testing is done. "Creation science" is religion based on the mythology in an old book.
gallo is offline   Reply With Quote