Quote:
|
Quote by: Technosoul I'm back and have revewed the comment of this forum to my last messages. Okay, we will not talk religion. We will assume that rights have no moral bearing and even if they did it was not due to a religious belief system. You all want to stick just with biological facts as well as political documents. That is okay - mind, body, but no spirit. I guess I can grasp that.
.......
Technosoul. |
Got to hand it to you technosoul, you shuck and jive with the best of them. You agree to stick to biology. Then you make a rambling, cursory bow of sorts to the biology and may or may not be admitting that the biology is inarguable. You devoted 198 words to the subject, 115 of which were off on a combination animal rights, turkey / egg tangent. So you actually devoted 83 words to biology.
Then you immediately “dodge” the biology of human development and devote another 210 words to discussion about the “rights” and similarities of animals that are “close” to human beings that doesn’t make a biological point that I can see.
Then you devote 219 words to a ramble through “legal paperwork” in which you seem to try (and fail) to deny inalienable rights to minors. I believe that you have confused priveledge with right, but it doesn’t matter since it is not a biological point anyway.
Next comes 421 words devoted to demonstrating that you don’t understand what the meaning of “inalienable right to life” means.
Followed by 288 words in which you seem to suggest that it is best to abort all unborns because they may fall victim to the patriot act.
Then there are 42 words that suggest that I win the debate if all that matters is that a stem cell is created at the moment of conception. Actually, it is a totipotent cell, not a stem cell and the fact that it is a totipotent cell is what makes it a human being. A stem cell can grow to be a blood cell, or a liver cell or whatever, but left to its own, a stem cell can not grow to be more than a cell, or succession of cells. A totipotent cell on the other hand is a being that continues to develop into more and more mature stages of that being. Unborns are not stem cells, they are beings. Human beings.
Finally, there are 255 words to starboy in which you “conspiratorily” admit that you don’t grasp the biology so you will make fun of, and look down your nose at anyone who does. Furthermore, you will snicker at, and twist out of context all the concepts that you don’t understand in an attempt to discredit them without ever taking having to debate them head on.
Does that about sum it up?
So, we have you agreeing to stick to a biological argument. Then you proceed to type 1556 words, 83 of which are devoted to biology that in no way refute the fact that unborns are both human and alive and as such have an inalienable right to life.
Shuck and jive, grasping, clutching, reaching, failing…always failing.