| #2 Because an entertainer is automaticly considered a white hat, assuming that they are popular.
You have my opinion, and you also have my personal observations. Since all we see of the media is their personal observations, what do you constitute as proof? No substance is offered, so how does one dispute its value? We get to hear the opinions of our reporters but they do not offer any evidence. Therefore, all I am able to point out is weak reasoning and logical fallicies, no meat. Even less, because I do not feel inclined to pay them more than marginal attention. |