| damnrad,
you really don't know what libertarianism is, do you?
No thanks. I don't need to saddle myself with libertarian masters.
to be a libertarian is to NOT be a Master or be beholding to one - it is an oxymoron to say 'libertarian masters'
but your statement:
Why not let religions, and other communities, define marriage for themselves, while the state sanctions civil unions?
is almost purely libertarian... add the phrase 'religions AND civil unions' in place of 'religions' and wipe out everything beyond the comma (make it a period) and we are in complete harmony...
... come into the light... just one more small step...
michael
Take on the responsibility to be free |