Then, my dear Belveron, here is my current obversation:
"One hears what one wants to hear."
eg.
" if you find happiness in being obscure, be my guest. But I enjoy inspiring epiphany, not confusion."
... epiphanies, but for yourself only. I wish you many.
Confusion is only seen by the confused, my friend. I don't wish to 'inspire' another; I, like you, am inspired, itself! I do not seek happiness anymore. I can't seek what I have found! lol.
I speak to those who understand my 'line' only. The rest can say what they wish. It is an echo, if you will, for this moment. As this post is too only an echo of your last post. If impressions are skewed, we must only look at the expression objectively to come to a clear translation. The burden of which, is wholly yours. If skewed it seems still, then one has not surrendered subjective prejudice. When the point has cleared and 'come home', then the obstacles are removed and reception is no longer burdened with the prejudice of dogmatism; the expected language in the expected modalities.
I see we are very similar in this way. Thank you for your opinion. I can be direct. But you won't believe what I believe, anyway. Not because I told you so. There is only the experiential, in my world.
And isn't poetry nicer? At least we can agree upon what is "obscure" to both of us, 'eh?
Perhaps I publish my works under "poetry", or "comedy"!
Or, right along side the other fools on the shelf.
In any fashion, I totally agree with you.
Dadoo
